Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Disability
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Lumbee
Disability
Disability Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Lumbee
14.8%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,721,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,289,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 5.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 63.6% | 41.7% |
| Range | 58.3% | 37.8% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 19.4% |
| Median | 18.2% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 21.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Lumbee by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 0.91%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |