Czechoslovakian vs Costa Rican Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Costa Rican
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Costa Ricans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Costa Rican Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 39.0% | 8.8% |
| Range | 38.5% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Costa Ricans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |