Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Costa Rican Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Costa Rican
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Costa Ricans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
65.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Costa Rican Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,575,590 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 4.4% | 8.8% |
| Range | 3.8% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Costa Ricans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |