Sudanese vs Immigrants from Ireland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
 Immigrants from Ireland
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Ireland
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Ireland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,129,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,763,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.32%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Ireland | 
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.96% | 
| Maximum | 12.3% | 19.5% | 
| Range | 10.2% | 18.6% | 
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.2% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 3.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Ireland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 5.8%  |