Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Ireland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Ireland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Ireland
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Ireland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,763,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.37%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Ireland |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 23.8% | 19.5% |
Range | 21.4% | 18.6% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Ireland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |