Polish vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
White/Caucasian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Whites/Caucasians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,664,974 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 7.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 10.5% |
| Range | 45.5% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 0.96% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |