Norwegian vs Romanian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Norwegian
Romanian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Norwegians
Romanians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Romanian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,008,287 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,620,863 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.63%.
![Norwegian vs Romanian Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/norwegians-vs-romanians-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Romanian |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 10.2% |
Range | 15.8% | 9.9% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.95% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Romanians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Croatia (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Europe (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |