Maltese vs Immigrants from Belarus Vision Disability
COMPARE
Maltese
 Immigrants from Belarus
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Belarus
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Belarus Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,445,167 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,159,443 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.87%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Belarus | 
| Minimum | 0.070% | 0.50% | 
| Maximum | 6.1% | 4.6% | 
| Range | 6.0% | 4.1% | 
| Mean | 2.1% | 1.9% | 
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.52% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.82% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.81% | 
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Belarus by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 2.0%  |