Lumbee vs South African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
South African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Lumbee
South Africans
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs South African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,245,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,556,547 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 58.4%.
![Lumbee vs South African Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/lumbee-vs-south-africans-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | South African |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.42% |
Maximum | 7.2% | 5.4% |
Range | 6.3% | 5.0% |
Mean | 4.1% | 2.1% |
Median | 4.1% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Pakistani (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iraqi (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |
Serbians | 70.2 /100 | #157 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |