Lumbee vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
South African
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Lumbee
South Africans
31.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,059,421 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 31.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,612,100 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 106.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | South African |
Minimum | 4.9% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 74.7% | 50.7% |
Range | 69.8% | 48.4% |
Mean | 37.7% | 13.2% |
Median | 36.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.3% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.6% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (31.7%, a difference of 2.3%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (32.5%, a difference of 5.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Pima (29.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |