Lumbee vs Pueblo Vision Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Pueblo
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Pueblo
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Pueblo Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,245,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,045,963 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 1.6%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Pueblo |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 7.2% | 17.5% |
Range | 6.3% | 17.3% |
Mean | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Pueblo by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 2.7%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |