Japanese vs Liberian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Liberian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Japanese
Liberians
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Liberian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,155,070 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,084,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Liberian |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 10.6% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 34.1% |
| Range | 27.4% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 18.4% |
| Median | 18.9% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.2% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Liberians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Barbadian (18.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |