Israeli vs Immigrants from Lithuania Female Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
 Immigrants from Lithuania
 Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Israelis
Immigrants from Lithuania
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Immigrants from Lithuania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,173,315 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,022 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%.
 
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Immigrants from Lithuania | 
| Minimum | 0.17% | 2.4% | 
| Maximum | 25.9% | 16.5% | 
| Range | 25.8% | 14.1% | 
| Mean | 11.5% | 10.5% | 
| Median | 10.5% | 10.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Immigrants from Lithuania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 11.3%  |