Israeli vs Afghan Female Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
Afghan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Israelis
Afghans
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Afghan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,173,315 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,868,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.030%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Israeli | Afghan |
Minimum | 0.17% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 17.8% |
Range | 25.8% | 12.3% |
Mean | 11.5% | 10.9% |
Median | 10.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Afghans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |