Indian (Asian) vs Jordanian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Jordanian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Jordanians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Jordanian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,373,634 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Jordanian |
Minimum | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 7.5% | 3.7% |
Range | 7.3% | 3.4% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.75% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 0.69% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 0.68% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |