Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Slovak Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Slovak
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Slovaks
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Slovak Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,683,029 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.24%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Slovak |
| Minimum | 31.0% | 21.3% |
| Maximum | 89.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.9% | 78.7% |
| Mean | 66.3% | 62.9% |
| Median | 65.4% | 63.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 59.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Slovaks by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |