Immigrants from Morocco vs Slovak Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Slovak
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Slovaks
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
18.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Slovak Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,891,599 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,414,578 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f853/1f853f36aef3b7d9b8b3f2b73be3c12b6cc61817" alt="Immigrants from Morocco vs Slovak Vision Disability"
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Slovak |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Maximum | 5.6% | 12.9% |
Range | 5.3% | 12.6% |
Mean | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Netherlands (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Sierra Leonean (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Arab (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |