Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Alaskan Athabascan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Alaskan Athabascans
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,859 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,092 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 28.8%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 34.6% | 41.9% |
| Range | 28.6% | 37.5% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 18.3% |
| Median | 11.5% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Bhutanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |