Immigrants from Uruguay vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
New Zealander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
New Zealanders
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,904,660 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.87%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | New Zealander |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 12.7% | 17.7% |
Range | 9.2% | 16.2% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.6% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and New Zealanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |