Brazilian vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Congo
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Congo
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.020%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 0.82% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 7.3% | 5.3% |
| Range | 6.5% | 4.3% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.77% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Congo by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |