Immigrants from Norway vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Swedes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Swedish |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 47.7% |
| Range | 30.7% | 46.9% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 9.9% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |