Immigrants from Zaire vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Swedish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Swedes
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Swedish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,247,600 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.050%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Swedish |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 47.7% |
Range | 29.6% | 46.9% |
Mean | 6.9% | 9.9% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |