Immigrants from Serbia vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Uruguayan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Uruguayans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,742,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 23.8% |
| Range | 12.5% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Uruguayans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |