Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Central America Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Central America
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Central America
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Central America Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,995,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 14.7% |
| Range | 3.5% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Central America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |