Immigrants from Lithuania vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Costa Rican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Costa Ricans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.19%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 9.0% |
| Range | 3.5% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.2% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |