Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Afghan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Afghan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Afghans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Afghan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,842,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Afghan |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 7.0% |
| Range | 9.6% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.76% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Afghans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |