Indian (Asian) vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Brazilians
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,958,947 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 7.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.82% |
| Maximum | 5.5% | 7.3% |
| Range | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.54% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.64% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.64% | 1.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |