Guatemalan vs Central American Vision Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
 Central American
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Central Americans
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Central American Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,275,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,926,566 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Central American | 
| Minimum | 0.37% | 0.66% | 
| Maximum | 9.5% | 6.9% | 
| Range | 9.2% | 6.2% | 
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.2% | 
| Median | 2.4% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.71% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.81% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.81% | 
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Central Americans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are German Russian (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scottish (2.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Marshallese (2.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Congo (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Nicaraguans | 2.2 /100 | #230  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.0 /100 | #231  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #232  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Central Americans | 1.8 /100 | #233  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Scottish | 1.6 /100 | #234  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #235  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.4 /100 | #236  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250  | Tragic 2.3%  |