Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Immigrants from Latvia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ghanaians
Immigrants from Latvia
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,643,390 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,193 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 15.7% | 28.4% |
| Range | 15.1% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Immigrants from Latvia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |