German vs Samoan Vision Disability
COMPARE
German
 Samoan
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Germans
Samoans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
13.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Samoan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,195,961 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,065,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.28%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German | Samoan | 
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.64% | 
| Maximum | 15.7% | 5.8% | 
| Range | 15.1% | 5.1% | 
| Mean | 2.7% | 2.4% | 
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.80% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.00% | 
Demographics Similar to Germans and Samoans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216  | Tragic 2.3%  |