Immigrants from Thailand vs Samoan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Samoan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Samoans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Samoan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,065,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.47%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Samoan |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 5.8% |
| Range | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.00% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Samoans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |