French vs Immigrants from Latvia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
French
Immigrants from Latvia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
French
Immigrants from Latvia
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
90.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French vs Immigrants from Latvia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,255,575 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,738,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 0.86%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 49.0% |
| Range | 53.3% | 46.2% |
| Mean | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| Median | 17.0% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to French and Immigrants from Latvia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to French are Chilean (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |