Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Latvia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Latvia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Latvia
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Latvia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,257,310 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,738,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 4.4%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 49.0% |
Range | 22.6% | 46.2% |
Mean | 15.9% | 18.2% |
Median | 16.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Hispanic or Latino (17.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (17.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Hopi (17.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Grenada (17.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Malaysian (17.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 17.9% |
Malaysians | 0.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.6 /100 | #252 | Tragic 17.9% |
Hopi | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic 17.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 17.9% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 17.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #257 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 17.9% |
Ethiopians | 0.5 /100 | #259 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 17.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 17.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |