Fijian vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Fijian
 Hmong
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Fijians
Hmong
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,572 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 82.6%, a difference of 0.44%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | Hmong | 
| Minimum | 50.0% | 54.9% | 
| Maximum | 91.2% | 97.4% | 
| Range | 41.2% | 42.5% | 
| Mean | 79.7% | 83.6% | 
| Median | 82.8% | 83.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 80.9% | 80.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.5% | 87.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 7.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 7.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Hmong by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Osage (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Mexican American Indian (82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (82.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (82.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American Indian (82.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (82.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 83.0%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 82.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 82.8%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 82.8%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 82.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 82.7%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 82.6%  | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 82.6%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 82.6%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #299  | Tragic 82.5%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #300  | Tragic 82.5%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301  | Tragic 82.5%  |