Dutch West Indian vs Creek Female Disability
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Creek
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Creek
15.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Creek Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,770,005 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,448,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Creek |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 41.1% | 42.6% |
| Range | 38.5% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 20.5% |
| Median | 18.7% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Creek by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and Cherokee (14.9%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |