Colville vs Kiowa Female Disability
COMPARE
Colville
Kiowa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Colville
Kiowa
15.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Kiowa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,687,480 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,208 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 4.8%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville | Kiowa |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 36.4% |
| Range | 39.1% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 19.7% |
| Median | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Colville and Kiowa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.67%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |