Chippewa vs Scotch-Irish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Scotch-Irish
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Scotch-Irish
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Scotch-Irish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,439,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Scotch-Irish | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.57% | 
| Maximum | 20.9% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 18.9% | 49.4% | 
| Mean | 9.1% | 12.4% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 9.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 13.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 9.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 9.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Scotch-Irish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.030%), West Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |