Chippewa vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Inupiat
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Inupiat
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Inupiat | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.1% | 
| Maximum | 20.9% | 18.0% | 
| Range | 18.9% | 16.9% | 
| Mean | 9.1% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 3.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 6.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% | 
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |