Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ute Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ute
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ute
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ute Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,817,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Ute |
| Minimum | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 35.7% |
| Range | 12.7% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 15.9% |
| Median | 12.8% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ute by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
| Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
| Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |