Cajun vs Kiowa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cajun
 Kiowa
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cajuns
Kiowa
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Kiowa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,649,677 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,085,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 6.3%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Kiowa | 
| Minimum | 0.34% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 16.4% | 15.0% | 
| Range | 16.1% | 13.4% | 
| Mean | 4.0% | 5.1% | 
| Median | 3.5% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 4.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 3.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Kiowa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Apache (3.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Pima (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 3.9%  |