British vs Native Hawaiian Female Disability
COMPARE
British
Native Hawaiian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
British
Native Hawaiians
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
10.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Native Hawaiian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,017,231 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.17%.
![British vs Native Hawaiian Female Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-disability/british-vs-native-hawaiians-female-disability-chart.webp)
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 6.2% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.0% |
Range | 93.8% | 23.1% |
Mean | 25.6% | 13.0% |
Median | 16.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to British and Native Hawaiians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Italian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bahamian (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |
Italians | 10.7 /100 | #222 | Poor 12.4% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 9.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.5% |
Belizeans | 9.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.5% |
Poles | 8.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.5% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 8.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 8.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 7.8 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.5% |
Hungarians | 7.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.5% |