Blackfeet vs Tlingit-Haida Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Tlingit-Haida
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Blackfeet
Tlingit-Haida
26.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Tlingit-Haida Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,087,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,808,898 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 10.2% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 58.3% |
Range | 89.8% | 49.7% |
Mean | 36.1% | 30.1% |
Median | 32.3% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.1% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.6% | 36.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.6% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Tlingit-Haida by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Central America (26.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (26.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (26.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Spanish American Indian (26.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Bangladeshi (26.8%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Central American Indian (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (27.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mexican (27.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (27.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 26.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 26.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 26.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 26.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 26.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 26.6% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 26.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 26.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 26.7% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 26.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 27.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 27.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 27.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 27.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 27.2% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 27.2% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 27.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 27.3% |