Immigrants from Laos vs Tlingit-Haida Disability Age 65 to 74

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,426,016 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 26.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,808,898 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Laos	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	8.3%	8.6%
Maximum	75.0%	58.3%
Range	66.7%	49.7%
Mean	31.1%	30.1%
Median	27.8%	28.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	23.6%	23.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.2%	36.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.6%	12.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.8%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.7%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos and Tlingit-Haida by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Micronesia (26.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (26.2%, a difference of 0.10%), African (26.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Congo (26.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (26.3%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Central American Indian (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (27.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mexican (27.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (27.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Immigrants \| Congo	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 26.0%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 26.1%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 26.1%
Mexican American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 26.2%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 26.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 26.3%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 26.4%
Blackfeet	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 26.6%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 26.6%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 26.7%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 26.7%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 26.8%
Fijians	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 27.0%
Potawatomi	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 27.1%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 27.1%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 27.1%
Puget Sound Salish	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 27.2%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 27.2%