Bermudan vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bermudan
Immigrants from Thailand
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bermudans
Immigrants from Thailand
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
9.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,718,331 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bermudan | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 7.7% |
| Range | 6.7% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans and Immigrants from Thailand by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |