Iranian vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability
COMPARE
Iranian
Immigrants from Thailand
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Iranians
Immigrants from Thailand
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,677,046 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.41% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 2.8% | 7.7% |
| Range | 2.3% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Median | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.51% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.50% | 1.4% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Singapore (1.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Okinawan (1.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (1.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |