Barbadian vs Crow Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Barbadian
 Crow
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Barbadians
Crow
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Crow Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,286,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,204,118 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Crow | 
| Minimum | 0.77% | 4.4% | 
| Maximum | 13.4% | 20.2% | 
| Range | 12.7% | 15.8% | 
| Mean | 7.2% | 8.4% | 
| Median | 6.7% | 7.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Barbadians and Crow by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Yaqui (6.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (6.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.26%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278  | Tragic 6.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 6.7%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 6.9%  |