Immigrants from Western Asia vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,983,660 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,005 compared to $80,972, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $37,383, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,516 compared to $89,969, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $59,447, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $49,039, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 22.2%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%).