Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,742,747 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.699% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 699.1 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($108,544 compared to $99,591, a difference of 9.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,249 compared to $97,073, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($46,008 compared to $42,563, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,452 compared to $53,658, a difference of 5.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $89,969, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $49,039, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.0%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and poverty (13.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.1%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 51.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.8%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.7%).