Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Household Income | $100k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Households with Income > $100k vs State vs National
1.7410352.9%27.9%(+25.0)#1637.3%(+15.6)#4,004
2.7413749.7%27.9%(+21.8)#2437.3%(+12.4)#4,951
3.7411444.2%27.9%(+16.3)#4137.3%(+6.90)#6,926
4.7413139.9%27.9%(+12.0)#6437.3%(+2.60)#8,983
5.7413236.7%27.9%(+8.80)#8637.3%(-0.600)#10,750
6.7413336.1%27.9%(+8.20)#9337.3%(-1.20)#11,069
7.7410535.9%27.9%(+8.00)#9637.3%(-1.40)#11,192
8.7413435.6%27.9%(+7.70)#9937.3%(-1.70)#11,379
9.7413533.0%27.9%(+5.10)#12537.3%(-4.30)#13,108
10.7412030.8%27.9%(+2.90)#15737.3%(-6.50)#14,828
11.7413625.1%27.9%(-2.80)#25537.3%(-12.2)#19,655
12.7410825.0%27.9%(-2.90)#25637.3%(-12.3)#19,766
13.7414524.0%27.9%(-3.90)#27537.3%(-13.3)#20,650
14.7410424.0%27.9%(-3.90)#27637.3%(-13.3)#20,657
15.7411921.4%27.9%(-6.50)#34837.3%(-15.9)#22,929
16.7411220.1%27.9%(-7.80)#37737.3%(-17.2)#23,938
17.7410719.9%27.9%(-8.00)#38737.3%(-17.4)#24,135
18.7411618.1%27.9%(-9.80)#42237.3%(-19.2)#25,499
19.7412717.3%27.9%(-10.6)#43937.3%(-20.0)#26,032
20.7412917.2%27.9%(-10.7)#44337.3%(-20.1)#26,088
21.7412814.1%27.9%(-13.8)#53337.3%(-23.2)#28,050
22.7413012.8%27.9%(-15.1)#55437.3%(-24.5)#28,686
23.7410612.2%27.9%(-15.7)#56337.3%(-25.1)#28,938
24.7414611.5%27.9%(-16.4)#57837.3%(-25.8)#29,232
25.7412610.0%27.9%(-17.9)#59437.3%(-27.3)#29,822
26.741159.1%27.9%(-18.8)#60737.3%(-28.2)#30,112
27.741107.9%27.9%(-20.0)#61637.3%(-29.4)#30,467

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
52.9%
#2
49.7%
#3
44.2%
#4
39.9%
#5
36.7%
#6
36.1%
#7
35.9%
#8
35.6%
#9
33.0%
#10
30.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK with 52.9%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa is 26.3%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in Oklahoma is 27.9%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $100,000 in the United States is 37.3%.