Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Creek
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa

0.00%
5.00%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Creek vs State vs National
1.741074.63%1.32%(+3.31)#440.033%(+4.60)#56
2.741304.55%1.32%(+3.23)#450.033%(+4.52)#58
3.741063.87%1.32%(+2.55)#550.033%(+3.83)#70
4.741313.52%1.32%(+2.20)#590.033%(+3.49)#78
5.741272.66%1.32%(+1.35)#770.033%(+2.63)#108
6.741102.54%1.32%(+1.22)#820.033%(+2.50)#113
7.741262.36%1.32%(+1.05)#890.033%(+2.33)#124
8.741362.16%1.32%(+0.840)#980.033%(+2.12)#137
9.741121.97%1.32%(+0.657)#1070.033%(+1.94)#151
10.741151.81%1.32%(+0.490)#1160.033%(+1.77)#168
11.741451.70%1.32%(+0.382)#1220.033%(+1.67)#177
12.741161.69%1.32%(+0.372)#1230.033%(+1.66)#178
13.741321.57%1.32%(+0.255)#1320.033%(+1.54)#192
14.741031.56%1.32%(+0.243)#1340.033%(+1.53)#194
15.741351.47%1.32%(+0.154)#1410.033%(+1.44)#209
16.741041.37%1.32%(+0.049)#1490.033%(+1.33)#222
17.741281.35%1.32%(+0.033)#1500.033%(+1.32)#223
18.741191.32%1.32%(+0.005)#1530.033%(+1.29)#228
19.741341.25%1.32%(-0.067)#1590.033%(+1.22)#238
20.741291.22%1.32%(-0.092)#1640.033%(+1.19)#243
21.741051.14%1.32%(-0.175)#1740.033%(+1.11)#264
22.741081.08%1.32%(-0.238)#1800.033%(+1.05)#274
23.741331.02%1.32%(-0.295)#1870.033%(+0.989)#287
24.741371.02%1.32%(-0.299)#1880.033%(+0.986)#290
25.741460.89%1.32%(-0.424)#2080.033%(+0.860)#328
26.741200.65%1.32%(-0.672)#2460.033%(+0.613)#412
27.741140.53%1.32%(-0.787)#2640.033%(+0.498)#473

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
4.63%
#2
4.55%
#3
3.87%
#4
3.52%
#5
2.66%
#6
2.54%
#7
2.36%
#8
2.16%
#9
1.97%
#10
1.81%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK?
74107 has the Highest Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK with 4.63%.
What is the Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Creek Population in Tulsa is 1.69%.
What is the Percentage of Creek Population in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Creek Population in Oklahoma is 1.32%.
What is the Percentage of Creek Population in the United States?
Percentage of Creek Population in the United States is 0.033%.